Showing posts with label 1960. Show all posts
Showing posts with label 1960. Show all posts

Friday, October 14, 2022

The Long Dark Marathon of the Soul 2022: House of Usher (1960), directed by Roger Corman

 

and

The Appropriate Tune: 'Buried Alive' by Venom


       Nowadays the name of Edgar Allan Poe is so universal that it’s easy to forget just how influential he was to the world of literature. It was Poe that is credited for the very first detective novel, “The Murder at the Rue Morgue”, the foundation upon which thousands of novels, films and otherwise were built, from Sherlock Holmes to Monk. It was also Poe that helped to build America’s street cred in the literary world, which around this point was regarded as the boondocks of the written word. Not to mention his contributions to the development of horror fiction, as a writer and as an influence to other writers like H.P. Lovecraft. Mostly a name and a dour face in modern pop culture, I’m going to take the controversial position that Edgar Allan Poe was actually pretty good and deserves respect.


       The same could be said about Roger Corman as well, although to a far, far, lesser extent. In terms of output Corman easily outclasses the gothic novelist, having a hand in the creation of hundreds of films as a producer, although the vast majority of those films were budget titles that ranged from decent to shit that would struggle to make a good MST3K episode. In terms of influence might be a more flattering comparison then, as Corman is often credited for giving that initial push to many future hall of fame film legends. James Cameron, Jack Nicholson, Ron Howard, and so on and on. A few years back I covered The Masque of the Red Death, a Poe adaptation directed by Corman which ended up being one of his most successful films critically and commercially, so as long as we’re on this book kick, why not take a look at another of Corman’s Poe adaptations? It’ll probably be more fun than that Poe movie starring John Cusack at the very least.


       Released in 1960, House of Usher was written by Richard Matheson (the pen behind the excellent The Incredible Shrinking Man) and directed and produced by Roger Corman through Alta Vista Productions, based on “The Fall of the House of Usher” by Edgar Allan Poe. Mark Damon stars as Philip Winthrop, a dandy from Boston who is visiting the family home of his fiance, Madeline Usher (Myrna Fahey). Calling it a home might be too great a compliment actually -- Rather it’s a crumbling derelict stuck in the middle of blighted bog, the only residents being Madeline, manservant Bristol (Harry Ellerbe), and Madeline’s brother Roderick Usher (Vincent Prince).  Phil’s hope for a happy reunion is dashed however when he learns that Roderick is adamantly against the marriage. Madeline is seriously ill, suffering as her brother does from a severe hypersensitivity that makes even eating and sleeping difficult, but moreover she’s an Usher. The Usher bloodline is a tainted, evil one, Roderick says, and the only way to purge it from the world is to allow the last two members of the clan (Roderick and Madeline) to die, which would be hard to do if Madeline moved to Boston and started popping out kids. Bullshit, declares Phil, but as he tries to convince Madeline to leave with him even he cannot deny the choking miasma of doom and gloom that radiates from every corner of the manor. Is the Usher family really cursed, or is it a case of a self-fulfilling prophecy? Well it’s not called the Rise of the House of Usher is it?


       The one thing that comes to mind about the other Corman/Poe film that I covered, Masque of the Red Death, was that visually it looked very impressive, and I feel the same way about House of Usher. Much like James Whale’s The Old Dark House a few years previous, the movie lives or dies on not fucking up the house. The house is not only the story’s setting but a physical representation of the cancerous legacy of the Ushers and the deleterious effects it has on the people connected to it. You need that house to look good, and maybe it’s because budget films were easier to make in the 60s or because Corman only had to pay for 4 actors, but he nailed it. From the outside it’s an enormous decaying gothic monstrosity, the kind of place Batman would send psychopathic clowns to, and on the inside it’s full of dimly lit corridors, cobwebs and faded luxury. You get one look at that house and you know exactly what you’re supposed to feel about it, and the subtle moves Corman makes to make the viewer wonder if Roderick is right and the house is really evil are well done. Amityville should take a lesson from Roger Corman.


       Speaking of Roderick, we’ve got the return of Vincent Price to a Corman production, or the debut because I believe Masque came out later, which is a treat because Price and B horror movies go together like cheese and fine wine. Roderick Usher is also more of an interesting character than the one he played in Masque, which if I recall correctly was just a spooky Satanist. Roderick is the villain of the piece, and yet his actions don’t come from a place of malice, but of guilt. He loves his sister, but the Ushers have been such a miserable blight upon themselves and their fellow man that he believes he’s doing the world a service. Still creepy in that classic Price fashion, but there’s a tragic irony in Usher that I think he pulls out wonderfully. The other cast members are solid, but this is definitely a Vincent Price vehicle.


       I brought up The Old Dark House, and upon further reflection I’d say that it’s an apt comparison beyond both films featuring an old dark house. The Old Dark House was a Universal horror film, directed by the man responsible for the best of the Universal horror films, and it is that series that Corman seems to be emulating. Aside from the dream sequence at the end which felt purposefully trippy and the use of blood, Usher carries itself and set things up just as you’d see in that era of genre films, only in color. In fact I like House of Usher as an unofficial Universal horror film more than I did Old Dark House, which for all its gloomy atmosphere never really had a good payoff, compared to the explosion of madness and horror that accompanies the end of House of Usher.


       House of Usher gets the recommendation. A solidly made, solidly performed horror film, and proof that you don’t need multi-million dollar budgets to make great art. Fans of genre films who have already burned through the best of Universal and Hammer will find a kindred spirit here, and fans of Poe will get a nice 90 minute serving of Gothic horror and depressed aristocrats, just as the man intended. Get your bowels of gruel steaming hot and your family coffins cozy, and House of Usher will ensure a pleasant scary movie night.

Wednesday, October 31, 2018

The Long Dark Marathon of the Soul 2014: The Virgin Spring (1960), directed by Ingmar Bergman

     
and

     So far we’ve had some pretty iconic directors sprinkled around the list this year. Alfred Hitchcock, David Lynch, John Milius, etc. Which is great, but with the exception of Hitchcock, we haven’t really broken out of the United States yet. Which is bad, because there are scores of great films and great directors outside of America and Britain that are worth experiencing. Like Swedish filmmaker Ingmar Bergman for example, one of the most famous auteur directors of all time, and whose name sounds like something you’d call your pet alien. Bergman’s films are notoriously bleak and somber affairs, frequently dealing with such lovely themes as death and insanity, and used so many long bouts of silence that it makes Stanley Kubrick seem inadequate by comparison. Which sounds like just the right kind of mood to be in on Halloween, so I decided to pick a Bergman film more or less at random and see how it went. What I ended up with was The Virgin Spring.

      In a scenic part of the featureless Swedish countryside, there once lived a Swedish family, who lived their lives as was appropriate for Swedes to do at the time. The pride and joy of the family was the daughter, Karen, a beautiful young girl with golden hair and a willful personality, One day, Karen and her kind-of-insane relative Ingeri take a trip to the local church, to deliver the candles for Mass. Tragically, while on the way to the aforementioned church, Karen is accosted by three goatherds. Karen is raped and murdered, her possessions looted and her body covered in dirt and mud. The family is understandably upset when Karen is missing for so long, and when three mysterious travelers come by to stay the night, carrying a familiar looking shift to trade, it sets the stage for some good old-fashioned revenge.

     I have to admit that The Virgin Spring was a bit tough for to get into at the beginning, those long bouts of silence and vague dialogue are all too real, but once I got into the meat of the story it started getting really interesting. That bleak atmosphere Bergman is so famous for is totally appropriate in a movie about the futility of vengeance and the silence of God. While not really a horror movie (unless you count the destruction of innocence), it’s a good film to put under your belt if you’re looking to become a more advanced movie fan, or if you want to clear the room after a particularly raucous party this Halloween. And if you’re Swedish, well, you know what to do.

Saturday, October 31, 2015

The Long Dark Marathon of the Soul 2015: Psycho (1960), directed by Alfred Hitchcock


There we have it folks. Another year passed and another Halloween marathon completed, though perhaps not the only thing I'll be doing for the holiday. Even though I started working on this list in the middle of summer, I still ended up getting down to the wire, which is why some of these entries might seem a bit haphazard (some movies lend themselves better to writing than others though). I don't know if that means I need to make stricter deadlines for myself or just shorter ones, but at least I didn't waste half the month before posting them, right? I think I ended up with a pretty good selection of films too, maybe a bit more outside the horror genre than last year, but I'm an eclectic man with eclectic tastes, and it's just something we all have to deal with. I hope all of you reading out there found something new to try out this Halloween, and it ends up being something you enjoy. Not love, necessarily, we all different tastes after all, but just something that you can enjoy. If these little scribblings can help you discover a movie that you'll really enjoy, something that makes you laugh or cry or think even inspires your own art, then that's more than enough for me. It might be a tall order, but I can hope.

Happy Halloween!

and


     Since I rarely get comments on the articles I write, I’m going to assume I being silently judged for the film i’m highlighting this time around. Judgement for waiting till now to watch Psycho, judgement for placing it at the number one position (even though the placement doesn’t really mean anything) when Vertigo placed lower on last year’s list, despite being considered one of the greatest films of all time. Continuous, constant judgement. However, if there was one director who really earned the right to be at the top of any movie Marathon, much less mine, it’s Alfred Hitchcock. Without his influence, without seminal works like North by Northwest, Vertigo, Rear Window, Rope (a personal favorite), The Birds, etc. filmmaking as we know it would not be what it is today, and that goes double for the horror/thriller genres. When people talk about auteurs, those directors of supreme creative talent and vision, they’re talking about guys like Hitchcock. I’ve discussed him several times in my reviews of Rope and Vertigo, you can go there to see even more opinions.

     While Psycho is certainly deserving of its spot in film history, being a prototype of the ‘slasher’ movie years before that subgenre really growing steam, I think the more worthy legacy of Psycho is solidifying the idea of humanity being its own monster. Prior to Psycho, a lot of your horror antagonists were fantastical beings, Dracula, Frankenstein’s Monster, The Thing from Beyond Space, and so on. After Psycho, the movies were darker and more ‘real’, and yet the antagonists were still fantastical. Jason Voorhees is an undead killing machine, Freddy Krueger is a dream demon, Leatherface is some sort of hyper exaggerated Ed Gein, we’re still dealing with monsters. Still in the realm of fiction. Norman Bates though? Norman Bates could be the guy behind you in line at Taco Bell, or the guy pumping your gas. Throughout your day-to-day life you could interact with dozens, maybe hundreds of people, and any one of those seemingly normal people could be a murderer or a psychopath, and go through your entire life not knowing it. In real life there’s no identifying features like aversion to garlic or silver to determine who wants to make your skin into an ipad cover, and so you watch horror movies to work out that instinctual paranoia in a safe environment. Then Psycho comes in and reminds you of that fear, and suddenly you’re out of that comfort zone that vampires and mummies had built up for you. Suddenly you can’t help but realize that you can’t really know other people the way you know yourself, and that you can never be sure what they’re thinking, or if they mean what they say. That’s why we have wars and racism and all that other horrible stuff, and that’s why Psycho is such an effective horror film. Because anybody could be a Norman Bates, and Norman Bates could be anybody.

     I’m not going to give too much away again, because I’m not really in the mood for recapping the story, but I will say that it’s not really the kind of movie you’d expect. Psycho is mainly known in pop culture for the infamous shower murder, which I think gives it the impression of being a slasher like Friday the 13th or Halloween. In fact, that scene is more like build up to the rest of the film, which is about investigating that murder and catching Bates. It’s sort of like the plot to an Columbo story, where we know who the murderer is and how they murdered the victim, and we’re just watching the character’s journey up until the point where they put it together and it all comes together. Since I’m a huge fan of Columbo, as should we all, maybe that explains some things.

     Watch Psycho, I guess is the suggestion here. There’s really not any deep philosophical arguments to be had like with Rope or Vertigo, it’s just thrills, chills and attractive women that Hitchcock probably verbally abused during filming. All in all a horror classic, prime Halloween material whether one is alone or with friends, even decades after its release. True art never really fades, even if the people in the pictures do.

A Brief Return

       If anyone regularly reads this blog, I'm sorry that I dropped off the face of the Earth there with no warning. Hadn't planned...